Skip to content

Docs confusion with include=all #2271

Description

@adrianbj

On: https://processwire.com/docs/selectors/ is states:

"include=all indicates that you don't want any exclusions and results may include hidden pages, unpublished pages, or pages that aren't viewable to the user via access control."

but as we know, it also includes pages in the trash and I think that should be mentioned and noted that in most cases you likely want include=unpublished, status!=trash , rather than include=all

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions