Should we rename this repository/package? #645
Archmonger
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 4 comments 10 replies
|
+1 to a name change! I'm not super involved in the project, but I do agree that a different name that implies the reactive nature of this project will help. |
1 reply
8 replies
|
We'll also need new branding. A first pass logo could be the react atom except the loops around the atomic core are one or more snakes. |
0 replies
|
Do you plan to keep the dependency on ReactJS? I am asking because it would be very convenient if we could load other JS frameworks like Alpine.js. |
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
So there's a couple of reasons to consider a rename.
IDOMdoes without first knowing what a Documented Oriented Model is, so they might not click on the project. But, IDOM's usage is simple enough to where the user doesn't actually need to understand what a DOM is.Here's a couple potential names that could increase name clarity.
I personally believe having React in the name makes sense for us, since we heavily rely on the ReactJS Client to do anything in the front-end.
Comment below if you have other naming ideas, have a personal favorite name, or if you agree/disagree with this.
If we perform a name change, this should be done sooner rather than later. The longer a package exists, the more difficult a name change becomes.
All reactions