docs: remove stale author TODO comments in relations tutorial#6047
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Surfaced by the nightly survey of
web/book/src/tutorial/relations.md.The tutorial source carried two stale author-notes that ship in the book source:
<!-- todo: make sure that the new column is unnamed -->(after thederive { VAT = ... }example) directly contradicts the paragraph immediately below it, which states the new column is assigned the nameVAT. Thederiveexample explicitly names the column, so the TODO is resolved and incorrect.<!-- PRQL uses the data from... _Where does our data come from? Do we use some canonical version?_ -->at the end of the file is a leftover author musing, not documentation.This removes both. Pure documentation change — no test is feasible.