Renamed CI gate job to the org-standard "Required checks pass"#176
Conversation
Branch protection currently requires the check named "All tests pass". Requiring a repo-specific or legacy check name couples the ruleset to this workflow's job naming: rename the job and the required check silently stops existing, blocking every PR. The org is standardizing every repository on a single stable aggregator check named "Required checks pass" so rulesets have one uniform, rename-proof target across all repos. The branch ruleset is being updated in the same pass to require the new check context, so this PR must go green on "Required checks pass" before it can merge. Coverage is unchanged: the gate still depends on the same jobs the old gate covered.
|
Bugbot is not enabled for this team, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in: 24 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Why
Branch protection on this repo currently requires the status check named exactly
All tests pass. Requiring a repo-specific or legacy check name couples the ruleset to this workflow's job naming: rename the job (or restructure the matrix) and the required check silently stops existing, blocking every PR.The org is standardizing every repository on a single stable aggregator check named
Required checks pass— one job thatneedsevery job that must pass and fails if any of them failed or was cancelled. That gives every ruleset one uniform, rename-proof target.What
all-tests-pass/All tests pass→required-checks-pass/Required checks passtestjob the old gate coveredpermissions: contents: readNote on merging
The branch ruleset is being updated in the same pass to require the new check context, so this PR must go green on
Required checks passbefore merge. Do not merge until the ruleset swap is confirmed.