-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.9k
fix(@angular/build): prevent unit-test vitest runner from hanging after tests complete #33319
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
hebus
wants to merge
1
commit into
angular:main
Choose a base branch
from
hebus:fix-unit-test-vitest-exit
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
1. Defensive Programming Check
Since
vitestis a dependency that might be resolved to different versions in user workspaces, it is safer to defensively check ifexitis a function before calling it to prevent runtimeTypeErrorexceptions.2. Programmatic Execution &
process.exit()Side-EffectsCalling
vitest.exit()arms a teardown timeout that eventually callsprocess.exit(). While this successfully prevents hanging in standard CLI runs, it can be problematic when the builder is executed programmatically (for example, via the Architect API in custom scripts, monorepo tools like Nx, or IDE integrations). In those cases, abruptly callingprocess.exit()will terminate the entire host process, preventing subsequent tasks or cleanup from running.Consider adding a defensive check for
typeof this.vitest.exit === 'function', and potentially exposing a way to opt-out of the force-exit behavior if run programmatically.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the review. Responding to both points:
1. Defensive
typeofcheck — declined for consistency: this file already calls otherVitestinstance methods (close(),start(),invalidateFile()) without runtime guards.exit()is long-standing public API on theVitestclass — it is what thevitest runCLI itself calls on shutdown — covered by the package's vitest peer range and type-checked via theVitesttype fromvitest/node.2.
process.exit()side-effects in programmatic execution — this trade-off was weighed when preparing the change. The key property ofexit()is that itsteardownTimeoutsafety net only fires in the pathological case whereclose()would never settle; in every healthy teardown,exit()andclose()behave identically andprocess.exit()is never invoked. Comparing the scenarios:teardownTimeout. Runners like Nx and IDE integrations typically execute builders in dedicated forked processes, which narrows this further.If the maintainers consider the daemon scenario blocking, happy to gate this (e.g. only arm the safety net when the builder owns the process, or behind an option) — though that would give up protection precisely where most users hit #32832.