[v3-3-test] Run UI compile checks in CI when only an OpenAPI spec changes (#70643) - #70672
Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
[v3-3-test] Run UI compile checks in CI when only an OpenAPI spec changes (#70643)#70672github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
1 task
pierrejeambrun
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 29, 2026 10:17
pierrejeambrun
requested review from
amoghrajesh,
ashb,
bugraoz93,
choo121600,
ephraimbuddy,
gopidesupavan,
jason810496,
jedcunningham,
jscheffl,
potiuk and
vatsrahul1001
as code owners
July 29, 2026 10:18
Member
|
@shahar1 Something is off here, I wonder if it's transient or caused by the PR. |
…nges (#70643) #68919 changed _private_ui.yaml without regenerating the TypeScript client and CI stayed green: selective checks decide whether to skip the ts-compile-lint-* hooks from file groups that do not cover the UI codegen input specs, while the hooks themselves trigger on any yaml under the openapi directories. The stale client then masked a type error that broke main for every PR running full static checks. The same gap applied to v2-simple-auth-manager-generated.yaml, so a spec-only change also skipped the simple auth manager UI hook. Track the codegen-input specs in their own file group so spec-only changes run the UI hooks without forcing the full test matrix, and drop the main UI hook trigger for the simple auth manager spec: that pattern was copied in when the hook was created (#51725), a month after the spec was renamed v1 to v2 (#50705), so it has never matched a file - #53636 fixed the sibling hook's copy but missed this one. The main UI codegen does not consume that spec either. (cherry picked from commit b43a87e) Co-authored-by: Shahar Epstein <60007259+shahar1@users.noreply.github.com>
potiuk
force-pushed
the
backport-b43a87e-v3-3-test
branch
from
July 30, 2026 19:37
d4919f9 to
ed99d11
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#68919 changed _private_ui.yaml without regenerating the TypeScript client
and CI stayed green: selective checks decide whether to skip the
ts-compile-lint-* hooks from file groups that do not cover the UI codegen
input specs, while the hooks themselves trigger on any yaml under the
openapi directories. The stale client then masked a type error that broke
main for every PR running full static checks. The same gap applied to
v2-simple-auth-manager-generated.yaml, so a spec-only change also skipped
the simple auth manager UI hook. Track the codegen-input specs in their own
file group so spec-only changes run the UI hooks without forcing the full
test matrix, and drop the main UI hook trigger for the simple auth manager
spec: that pattern was copied in when the hook was created (#51725), a
month after the spec was renamed v1 to v2 (#50705), so it has never matched
a file - #53636 fixed the sibling hook's copy but missed this one. The main
UI codegen does not consume that spec either.
(cherry picked from commit b43a87e)
Co-authored-by: Shahar Epstein 60007259+shahar1@users.noreply.github.com