Skip to content

Add metric for Kafka offset commit failures#38889

Open
Kriti-dev07 wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
Kriti-dev07:kafka-metrics-clean
Open

Add metric for Kafka offset commit failures#38889
Kriti-dev07 wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
Kriti-dev07:kafka-metrics-clean

Conversation

@Kriti-dev07

@Kriti-dev07 Kriti-dev07 commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Adds a Beam metric to track Kafka offset commit failures in KafkaCommitOffset.

Changes

  • Added a commit-failures counter metric in CommitOffsetDoFn.
  • Increment the metric whenever consumer.commitSync() throws an exception.
  • Existing logging behavior is preserved.

Motivation

This provides visibility into Kafka offset commit failures through Beam metrics, making it easier to monitor and diagnose commit-related issues in production pipelines.

Testing

  • Ran Spotless formatting.
  • Verified the project builds successfully locally.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances observability for Kafka I/O operations in Apache Beam by adding instrumentation to track failed offset commits. By capturing these failures as metrics, users can better monitor the health and reliability of their Kafka pipelines.

Highlights

  • Metrics Integration: Introduced a new counter metric 'commit-failures' to track Kafka offset commit errors.
  • Error Monitoring: Updated the KafkaCommitOffset logic to increment the failure counter whenever an exception occurs during the offset commit process.
New Features

🧠 You can now enable Memory (public preview) to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a commit-failures counter metric in KafkaCommitOffset to track failed offset commits. The review feedback suggests declaring the Counter as static final (and renaming it to COMMIT_FAILURES) to avoid serialization overhead and adhere to standard naming conventions.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

Comment on lines +67 to +68
private final Counter commitFailures =
Metrics.counter(CommitOffsetDoFn.class, "commit-failures");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

In Apache Beam, it is a best practice to declare Counter metrics as static final rather than instance variables. This avoids unnecessary object creation per DoFn instance and prevents serialization overhead, as metrics are registered globally per class namespace. Additionally, static final fields should follow the screaming snake case naming convention (e.g., COMMIT_FAILURES).

Suggested change
private final Counter commitFailures =
Metrics.counter(CommitOffsetDoFn.class, "commit-failures");
private static final Counter COMMIT_FAILURES =
Metrics.counter(CommitOffsetDoFn.class, "commit-failures");

element.getKey().getTopicPartition(),
new OffsetAndMetadata(element.getValue() + 1)));
} catch (Exception e) {
commitFailures.inc();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Update the counter reference to use the static final COMMIT_FAILURES constant.

Suggested change
commitFailures.inc();
COMMIT_FAILURES.inc();

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Assigning reviewers:

R: @kennknowles for label java.
R: @sjvanrossum for label kafka.

Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant