Add Cbrt and Trunc UDF classes to geaflow-dsl-plan math package#808
Open
adamdavis99 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Add Cbrt and Trunc UDF classes to geaflow-dsl-plan math package#808adamdavis99 wants to merge 1 commit into
adamdavis99 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…ster them in BuildInSqlFunctionTable, and add unit tests. SIGN was intentionally omitted. It already exists as a SQL operator via GeaFlowOverwriteSqlOperators.SIGN backed by GeaFlowBuiltinFunctions.sign(). Closes apache#790
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add Cbrt and Trunc UDF classes to geaflow-dsl-plan math package, register them in BuildInSqlFunctionTable, and add unit tests.
SIGN was intentionally omitted. It already exists as a SQL operator via GeaFlowOverwriteSqlOperators.SIGN backed by GeaFlowBuiltinFunctions.sign().
Closes #790
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
How was this PR tested?