Skip to content

ci: TRAC-881 Split Linear pipelines per branch and name releases#3091

Draft
chanceaclark wants to merge 1 commit into
canaryfrom
chancellorclark/ltrac-913-split-linear-pipelines
Draft

ci: TRAC-881 Split Linear pipelines per branch and name releases#3091
chanceaclark wants to merge 1 commit into
canaryfrom
chancellorclark/ltrac-913-split-linear-pipelines

Conversation

@chanceaclark

@chanceaclark chanceaclark commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Jira: TRAC-881

What/Why?

Fast-follow to #3085/#3086/#3090. canary and integrations/makeswift were sharing one Linear pipeline ("Catalyst Release") with no version pinned on syncsync targets "whatever release is currently open," so with no release in progress, whichever branch pushed first would create one and the other branch's sync would attach its issues to that same release instead of starting its own. Two independently-versioned products (each with their own npm package, semver cadence, and release cut timing) need two independent release trains, not one shared "current release."

Splits the access_key per branch (LINEAR_ACCESS_KEY for canary, a new LINEAR_MAKESWIFT_ACCESS_KEY for integrations/makeswift) so each targets its own Linear pipeline entirely — no shared state, no collision risk. integrations/makeswift's pipeline/key still needs to be created in Linear before this is meaningful on that branch (tracked separately).

Also sets a descriptive name on the in-progress release instead of Linear's default "New release" (e.g. @bigcommerce/catalyst-core (unreleased)), and renames it to the real package@version tag once complete fires.

Testing

Requires the LINEAR_MAKESWIFT_ACCESS_KEY secret to exist before merging, otherwise the integrations/makeswift sync/complete steps will fail on missing access key. Watch the next push to canary to confirm the release shows the descriptive name pre-publish and gets renamed to the version tag on completion.

canary and integrations/makeswift shared one Linear pipeline with no
version pinned on sync, so with no release currently open, whichever
branch pushed first would create one and the other branch's sync would
attach to that same release instead of starting its own. Two
independently-versioned products need two independent release trains, so
each branch now targets its own pipeline via its own access key
(LINEAR_ACCESS_KEY for canary, LINEAR_MAKESWIFT_ACCESS_KEY for
integrations/makeswift).

Also give the in-progress release a descriptive name instead of Linear's
default "New release", and rename it to the real package@version tag once
`complete` fires.

Refs TRAC-881

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 5dc32ae

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
catalyst Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 8, 2026 9:52pm

Request Review

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bundle Size Report

Comparing against baseline from 4ef6b2c (2026-07-08).

No bundle size changes detected.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Unlighthouse Performance Comparison — Vercel

Comparing PR preview deployment Unlighthouse scores vs production Unlighthouse scores.

Summary Score

Aggregate score across all categories as reported by Unlighthouse.

Prod Desktop Prod Mobile Preview Desktop Preview Mobile
Score 89 93 91 94

Category Scores

Category Prod Desktop Prod Mobile Preview Desktop Preview Mobile
Performance 71 88 77 93
Accessibility 95 98 95 92
Best Practices 100 100 100 100
SEO 88 88 100 100

Core Web Vitals

Metric Prod Desktop Prod Mobile Preview Desktop Preview Mobile
LCP 5.1 s 3.8 s 3.2 s 3.1 s
CLS 0.037 0 0.001 0
FCP 1.2 s 1.2 s 1.1 s 1.1 s
TBT 0 ms 0 ms 20 ms 0 ms
Max Potential FID 40 ms 50 ms 60 ms 50 ms
Time to Interactive 5.1 s 3.9 s 6.0 s 3.2 s

Full Unlighthouse report →

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant