Skip to content

[release-4.21] OCPBUGS-88295, OCPBUGS-88297, OCPBUGS-82146, OCPBUGS-78330, OCPBUGS-85550: Promote GatewayAPIWithoutOLM feature gate to TechPreview#2873

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.21from
gcs278:backport-GatewayAPIWithoutOLM-TP-4.21
Jun 16, 2026

Conversation

@gcs278

@gcs278 gcs278 commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Promote the GatewayAPIWithoutOLM feature gate to TechPreviewNoUpgrade on release-4.21 to allow CI soak before GA promotion. This is part of an approved SBAR to backport the Sail Library (noOLM) from 4.22 to 4.19–4.21.

Background

Gateway API on OCP 4.19–4.21 uses the Cluster Ingress Operator (CIO) to install Istio via OLM (OSSM operator). This path has several critical bugs:

  • OCPBUGS-88295: OSSM z-stream upgrades are blocked, preventing CVE fixes from being delivered
  • OCPBUGS-82146: OLM-related install failures
  • OCPBUGS-78330: Hardcoded catalog source breaks disconnected environments
  • OCPBUGS-85550: Gateway API fails on clusters without Marketplace capability

In OCP 4.22, NE-2286 replaced OLM with the Sail Library — CIO now installs Istio directly via embedded Helm charts. This feature shipped as GA behind the GatewayAPIWithoutOLM feature gate.

Rollout Plan

Phase 1 — Land code (gate OFF)

Phase 2 — TechPreview soak

  • This PR — FG promotion to TechPreviewNoUpgrade
  • Verify CI soak in TP periodic jobs

Phase 3 — GA promotion

Follow-up

…TechPreview

Enable the GatewayAPIWithoutOLM feature gate in DevPreviewNoUpgrade and
TechPreviewNoUpgrade feature sets to allow CI soak before GA promotion.
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 3, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gcs278: This pull request references NE-2480 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Enable the GatewayAPIWithoutOLM feature gate in DevPreviewNoUpgrade and TechPreviewNoUpgrade feature sets on release-4.21 to allow CI soak before GA promotion.

This is an intermediate step before promoting to Default (GA) in PR #2865.

Merge Order

This should be merged after the Sail Library backport PR lands in cluster-ingress-operator (openshift/cluster-ingress-operator#1442) and before the GA promotion PR (#2865).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @gcs278! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: d943ccbf-8801-4306-8684-fe59306800b4

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 3, 2026
@gcs278 gcs278 changed the title [release-4.21] NE-2480: Promote GatewayAPIWithoutOLM feature gate to TechPreview [release-4.21] OCPBUGS-88295, OCPBUGS-88297, OCPBUGS-82146, OCPBUGS-78330, OCPBUGS-85550: Promote GatewayAPIWithoutOLM feature gate to TechPreview Jun 11, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 11, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88295, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86778 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86778 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @melvinjoseph86

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88297, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-79467 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-79467 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (iamin@redhat.com), skipping review request.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82146, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76609 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76609 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (iamin@redhat.com), skipping review request.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78330, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88300 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88300 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (iamin@redhat.com), skipping review request.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85550, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.21.z" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Enable the GatewayAPIWithoutOLM feature gate in DevPreviewNoUpgrade and TechPreviewNoUpgrade feature sets on release-4.21 to allow CI soak before GA promotion.

This is an intermediate step before promoting to Default (GA) in PR #2865.

Merge Order

This should be merged after the Sail Library backport PR lands in cluster-ingress-operator (openshift/cluster-ingress-operator#1442) and before the GA promotion PR (#2865).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 11, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested a review from melvinjoseph86 June 11, 2026 01:14
@gcs278

gcs278 commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88295, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86778 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86778 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @melvinjoseph86

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88297, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-79467 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-79467 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (iamin@redhat.com), skipping review request.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82146, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76609 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76609 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (iamin@redhat.com), skipping review request.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78330, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88300 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88300 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (iamin@redhat.com), skipping review request.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85550, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.21.z" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@gcs278

gcs278 commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 11, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88295, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86778 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86778 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @melvinjoseph86

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88297, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-79467 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-79467 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (iamin@redhat.com), skipping review request.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82146, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76609 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76609 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (iamin@redhat.com), skipping review request.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78330, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88300 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88300 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (iamin@redhat.com), skipping review request.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85550, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88302 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88302 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @melvinjoseph86

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 11, 2026
@gcs278 gcs278 marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2026 00:20
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 16, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from JoelSpeed and everettraven June 16, 2026 00:21
@gcs278

gcs278 commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/pipeline required

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test e2e-aws-ovn
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance
/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-2of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-1of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-2of2
/test e2e-azure
/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-upgrade
/test e2e-upgrade-out-of-change

@gcs278

gcs278 commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Unrelated failures in e2e-gcp:

: [sig-api-machinery] CustomResourcePublishOpenAPI [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] works for multiple CRDs of same group but different versions [Conformance] expand_more	57s
: [sig-cli] kubectl kuberc given preferences should be ignored when flags are explicitly passed expand_more

Not techpreview.
/test e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gcs278: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@everettraven everettraven left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 16, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tests from second stage were triggered manually. Pipeline can be controlled only manually, until HEAD changes. Use command to trigger second stage.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: everettraven

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 16, 2026
@everettraven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jun 16, 2026
@rhamini3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Confirmed that the 4.21 Origin tests related to gatewayAPIWithoutOLM is passing and the techpreview cluster must-gather has gatewayAPIWithoutOLM enabled in the featuregate YAML

/verified by CI

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jun 16, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rhamini3: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

Confirmed that the 4.21 Origin tests related to gatewayAPIWithoutOLM is passing and the techpreview cluster must-gather has gatewayAPIWithoutOLM enabled in the featuregate YAML

/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 253fff2 into openshift:release-4.21 Jun 16, 2026
26 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gcs278: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88295: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged:

All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88295 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

This PR is marked as verified. If the remaining PRs listed above are marked as verified before merging, the issue will automatically be moved to VERIFIED after all of the changes from the PRs are available in an accepted nightly payload.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88297: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged:

All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88297 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

This PR is marked as verified. If the remaining PRs listed above are marked as verified before merging, the issue will automatically be moved to VERIFIED after all of the changes from the PRs are available in an accepted nightly payload.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82146: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged:

All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82146 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

This PR is marked as verified. If the remaining PRs listed above are marked as verified before merging, the issue will automatically be moved to VERIFIED after all of the changes from the PRs are available in an accepted nightly payload.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78330: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged:

All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78330 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

This PR is marked as verified. If the remaining PRs listed above are marked as verified before merging, the issue will automatically be moved to VERIFIED after all of the changes from the PRs are available in an accepted nightly payload.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85550: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged:

All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-85550 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

This PR is marked as verified. If the remaining PRs listed above are marked as verified before merging, the issue will automatically be moved to VERIFIED after all of the changes from the PRs are available in an accepted nightly payload.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Promote the GatewayAPIWithoutOLM feature gate to TechPreviewNoUpgrade on release-4.21 to allow CI soak before GA promotion. This is part of an approved SBAR to backport the Sail Library (noOLM) from 4.22 to 4.19–4.21.

Background

Gateway API on OCP 4.19–4.21 uses the Cluster Ingress Operator (CIO) to install Istio via OLM (OSSM operator). This path has several critical bugs:

  • OCPBUGS-88295: OSSM z-stream upgrades are blocked, preventing CVE fixes from being delivered
  • OCPBUGS-82146: OLM-related install failures
  • OCPBUGS-78330: Hardcoded catalog source breaks disconnected environments
  • OCPBUGS-85550: Gateway API fails on clusters without Marketplace capability

In OCP 4.22, NE-2286 replaced OLM with the Sail Library — CIO now installs Istio directly via embedded Helm charts. This feature shipped as GA behind the GatewayAPIWithoutOLM feature gate.

Rollout Plan

Phase 1 — Land code (gate OFF)

Phase 2 — TechPreview soak

  • This PR — FG promotion to TechPreviewNoUpgrade
  • Verify CI soak in TP periodic jobs

Phase 3 — GA promotion

Follow-up

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants