Skip to content

Scope Cloud Topics shadow link limitation to versions earlier than 26.2#1812

Open
Lazin wants to merge 3 commits into
betafrom
cloud-topics-shadow-link-26.2
Open

Scope Cloud Topics shadow link limitation to versions earlier than 26.2#1812
Lazin wants to merge 3 commits into
betafrom
cloud-topics-shadow-link-26.2

Conversation

@Lazin

@Lazin Lazin commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

Shadow links support Cloud Topics starting in Redpanda v26.2. This updates the Cloud Topics limitations partial so the "shadow links do not support Cloud Topics" limitation is scoped to versions earlier than 26.2, following the repo's existing version-scoped wording convention.

Fulfills request in https://redpandadata.atlassian.net/browse/DOC-2127

Review deadline:

Page previews

https://deploy-preview-1812--redpanda-docs-preview.netlify.app/streaming/26.2/develop/manage-topics/cloud-topics/
https://deploy-preview-1812--redpanda-docs-preview.netlify.app/streaming/26.2/manage/kubernetes/cloud-topics/

Checks

  • New feature
  • Content gap
  • Support Follow-up
  • Small fix (typos, links, copyedits, etc)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@Lazin
Lazin requested a review from a team as a code owner July 20, 2026 11:03
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for redpanda-docs-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c49e22f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/redpanda-docs-preview/deploys/6a6232daad4e090008ebf102
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1812--redpanda-docs-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updates the Cloud Topics limitations note to clarify that shadow links did not support Cloud Topics before Redpanda 26.2, and that this limitation is lifted starting with version 26.2.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the version-scoped Cloud Topics shadow link limitation update.
Description check ✅ Passed The description includes the required sections and the Jira link, page previews, and check box, with only the review deadline left blank.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch cloud-topics-shadow-link-26.2

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Shadow links support Cloud Topics starting in Redpanda 26.2, so the
limitation now applies only to earlier versions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Lazin
Lazin force-pushed the cloud-topics-shadow-link-26.2 branch from ce7c628 to 2c93a0e Compare July 22, 2026 12:07
@Lazin
Lazin changed the base branch from main to beta July 22, 2026 12:07
Comment thread modules/develop/partials/cloud-topics-limitations.adoc Outdated
Feediver1 and others added 2 commits July 22, 2026 10:57
The version scoping already implies the limitation is lifted in v26.2,
so drop the redundant second sentence.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants