🧪 test: add unit tests for summarizeToolInput#39
Conversation
Adds test coverage for `summarizeToolInput` covering: - Empty and invalid inputs - String truncations at limits - Specialized extraction for symbols, intervals, criteria, and limits - General fallback representation of JSON Objects Co-authored-by: toreleon <42534763+toreleon@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Updates the import path in `tests/toolSummary.test.ts` to use `.js` extension to comply with ESM module resolution. Co-authored-by: toreleon <42534763+toreleon@users.noreply.github.com>
1 participant
🎯 What: Added tests to address the missing test coverage for
summarizeToolInputinsrc/tui/lib/toolSummary.ts.📊 Coverage: Covered edge cases such as undefined, empty, strings, invalid JSON, extraction logic specific to ticker/timeframe/criteria, length truncations, and JSON object fallback formats.
✨ Result: Enhanced the reliability and predictability of
summarizeToolInputvia robust vitest unit tests.PR created automatically by Jules for task 8389331090436595869 started by @toreleon